If you are three months into a hiring search and still have not made an offer, it is easy to blame the job market. Sometimes the market really is part of it. But in my experience, a slow hiring process almost always comes down to something that got skipped before the job was ever posted. I know this because I run a very different kind of process every single year, and it taught me exactly where searches like this usually fall apart.
The Process Behind My Pantry
Every year, I buy tomatoes and other vegetables to can and process for the winter months. If I did not have a plan for putting them up, all of that produce would go bad, and I would lose a real amount of money.
I start by taking inventory of what is left over from last year and deciding what I actually want to make this year. There is always salsa, diced tomatoes for soups and green chili, pizza sauce, and plain sauce. But the order matters. If I make the sauce first, there may not be enough tomatoes left for salsa or diced tomatoes. Salsa and diced tomatoes take longer, since they require blanching and peeling, so I start there and follow the recipe for the number of jars I know I will get. Then I move to the plain sauce with whatever is left.
I start with two and a half bushels of tomatoes. I know from prior years I need two, and the extra half is for the spares I always end up using anyway.
None of this happens by accident. If I do not have a plan and a list of what I need, including jars and lids, I end up running out mid-project and scrambling to catch up. The plan starts well before I ever buy the produce. It starts with the recipes and the inventory. This year, I took stock, made my list, decided the order I would work in, and bought my produce. I started within a day, and four days later, I was done.
A Process Is a Process, Whether It's Tomatoes or a Job Opening
Where the Hiring Process Usually Breaks
There are a few gaps that show up again and again once I look at a hiring search that has stalled.
No salary listed. Not every state requires it, but I think it should always be there. If a candidate has to ask, you have already lost some goodwill, and in my experience, listing the range up front tends to attract more qualified candidates, not fewer. That number should exist before the posting is even drafted, so you can answer with confidence the moment someone asks.
No defined process behind the posting. Who reviews the resumes. Who makes the final call. What the timeline looks like from posting to start date. If none of that is decided before the posting goes live, you are building the plane while flying it.
Leaning too hard on applicant tracking systems. I think AI has a place in hiring, but I am not a fan of using it to screen people out before a person ever looks at the resume. Keyword matching does not capture the context in a resume that actually shows initiative and competence. A machine cannot see that.
Reading too few resumes. Look at all of them, not just the first fifty or however many trigger you to stop accepting. If you cannot find a good fit in fifty applications, the applicants are not the problem. The posting is.
Letting the search drag past a month. From job posting to start date should not take longer than that.
Running candidates through round after round of interviews. If three conversations are not enough to tell you whether someone is right for the role, more interviews will not fix that.
None of this means you did something wrong. It means the process is worth a second look, the same way my inventory count and the order I work in are what keep me from ending up with too much of one thing and not enough of another. A hiring search that is stuck in month three is usually not a sign of a bad candidate pool. It is a sign that the process underneath it needs some structure.
Ready to stop losing weeks to a hiring process that isn't working?
I don’t do one-size-fits-all. I’ll help you build a hiring process that gets the right person in the seat, faster.